Research Center for Semiotics RCS

zur deutschen VersionEnglish version

Technical University Berlin
Technical University Berlin
Faculty 1: History and communication sciences
Institute for Linguistics
RCS Homepage
Info about RCS
Personnel
Research
Courses
Events
Specialist associations
Links
Zeitschrift für Semiotik
Address

 

______________________________________________________________________

The "Zeitschrift für Semiotik": Abstracts  ______________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 

"Sign Theory and Pedagogy"

 
 
 

Year: 1985
Volume: 7
Number: 4

 

         _____________________________________

     
     
    Silke M. Kledzik 
    The teaching and learning by example principle and its semiotic basis 

    Howard Gardner  
    The development of symbol competence in children 

    Gerhard Schurz 
    Thinking, speaking and education: the current Piaget controversy 

    Enclosure 
    Werner Enninger und Stephen Scott 
    Carriages as things and signs 
    The semiotics of vehicle design 

    Study 
    Annemarie Lange-Seidl  
    Semiotics at the universities of the Federal Republics of Germany and Austria and Switzerland 


    The teaching and learning by example principle and its semiotic basis  

    Silke M. Kledzik, University of the Saarland 

    Summary. Teaching and learning by examples, one of the principal concepts of 
    didactics, has nearly disappeared from present-day pedagogical discussions. 
    Here, an attempt is made to revive this notion and to clarify it by means of a 
    linguistic and semiotic analysis. The semiotic features of examples are 
    specified, such as the simultaneity of possession of and reference to a given 
    property. In conclusion, the importance of teaching and learning by examples is 
    pointed out, especially as a "way of world-making" in the educational context. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    The development of symbol competence in children 

    Howard Gardner, Harvard Project Zero, Boston 

    Summary. The task for the analyst would be simple if there were a single symbol 
    system to be mastered, and only one kind of individual to master it. In fact, 
    however, research from several fields has now established that human beings are 
    capable of gaining proficiency in several symbol systems, that each symbol 
    system operates in part according to its own set of principles; and that 
    individuals of different ages and degrees of sophistication approach the task 
    of acquiring symbolic literacy in distinctive ways. In this paper, a normative 
    description of the course of symbolic development is provided. Following a 
    period of mundane symbol mastery in infancy, young children attain an initial 
    competence in dealing with a range of symbol systems in their culture (e.g. 
    language, gesture, picturing, numbers). Some psychological processes (called 
    "streams") prove specific to each symbol system, while others (called "waves") 
    appear to operate in parallel fashion across some or several symbol systems. By 
    school age, the major task confronted by the child is the mastery of notations, 
    or second-order symbol systems. These systems entail features of reduction, 
    systematicity and legibility. The way in which mastery of notational 
    symbolization occurs reflects both the developmental stage of the learner and 
    his cognitive style: some children operate by using a narrative or dramatic 
    approach to symbol systems, while others employ a configurational or patterning 
    approach. At the conclusion of the paper, some pedagogical implications of this 
    perspective on symbolic development are introduced. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    Thinking, speaking and education: the current Piaget controversy 

    Gerhard Schurz, University of Salzburg 

    For my mother's 50th birthday 

    Summary. Piaget's theory of knowledge, his developmental psychology, his theory 
    of language, and his pedagogics are reconstructed and scrutinized here from 
    both a theoretical and an empirical point of view. The following theses 
    expounded by Piaget are shown to be problematic or untenable: (1) Logical 
    structures can be explained by psychological development processes; (2) 
    cognitive structures arise from action, not from perception; (3) thought is 
    independent from language and language plays a secondary role in cognitive 
    development; (4) cognitive concepts are learnable only through individual 
    discovery. In conclusion, two of Piaget's basic assumptions are replaced by the 
    following ones: (A) Cognitive development is not controlled by general 
    structures, but by content-specific (interpretationdependent) structures; (B) 
    It is not the level of structure, but the semiotic type of representation 
    achieved for a cognitive structure that is characteristic of a given stage of a 
    child's cognitive development. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    Enclosure 
    Carriages as things and signs 
    The semiotics of vehicle design 

    Werner Enninger and Stephen Scott, University of GHS Essen 

    Summary. Carriages are not only antiquated things, but also complex signs. The 
    design features of carriages used in the Old Order communities in Pennsylvania 
    can be modeled as a codification of part of their social universe. Before the 
    interactional opening this carriage-code functions as a signaling system that 
    transmits to the interactants bits of information which are relevant for the 
    organization of the ensuing interaction. 
     


© 1999-2001, Webmaster Research Center for Semiotics, Institute for Linguistics, Fac. 1, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany