Research Center for Semiotics RCS

zur deutschen VersionEnglish version

Technical University Berlin
Technical University Berlin
Faculty 1: History and communication sciences
Institute for Linguistics
RCS Homepage
Info about RCS
Personnel
Research
Courses
Events
Specialist associations
Links
Zeitschrift für Semiotik
Address

 

______________________________________________________________________

The "Zeitschrift für Semiotik": Abstracts  ______________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 

"Art and Reality"

 
 
 

Year: 1983
Volume: 5
Number: 3

 

         _____________________________________

     
    Erika Fischer-Lichte  
    Art and reality. The semiotic reconstruction of historical art concepts 

    Jan Mukarovský  
    The problem of the functions of architecture 

    Kvetoslav Chvatík 
    The aesthetic attitude 

    Discussion 
    Heinz Paetzold  
    Semiotics and aesthetics. 
    Theses on their connection 

    Wolfhart Henckmann 
    Semiotics or hermeneutics? 

    Jörg Zimmermann  
    Semiotics or hermeneutics! 

    Rainer Piepmeier  
    In favour of a semiotic philosophy of art 

    Dietfried Gerhardus 
    Semiotic aesthetics as a reflection of artisitic object constitution, artistic depiction process and aesthetic experience 

    Nelson Goodman 
    Semiotic aesthetics and pragmatic irrealism 

    Enclosure 
    Karl Riha 
    The reason for art at all? 

    Interview 
    Algirdas J. Greimas 
    In conversation with Peter Stockinger 
    The current situation for semiotic research 

    Literary report 
    Tadashi Hirai  
    Semiotics in Japan 


    Art and reality. The semiotic reconstruction of historical art concepts  

    Erika Fischer-Lichte, University of Frankfurt 

    Summary. The paper sketches the most important historical conceptions of art - 
    the mimetical, the expressive the rhetorical and the cathartic - as well as 
    their deficiencies. The question is discussed to what extent these deficiencies 
    can be remedied by a semiotic reconstruction utilizing the approaches of J. 
    Mukarovský, J. Lotman, and J. Kristeva and the symbol theories of A. Lorenzer 
    and H. Lincke. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    The problem of the functions of architecture  

    Jan Mukarovský,  Prague 

    Summary. The author defines the function of an object with reference to its 
    being repeatedly used by the members of a society for a certain purpose. He 
    shows that reality is patterned by the hierarchy of functions valid in a given 
    society and in this way explains how an object can be a sign referring to its 
    own functions. Four horizons of function (the immediate, historical, societal, 
    and individual) are distinguished for every object, and the aesthetic function 
    is introduced as the dialectical negation of functionality per se; through it, 
    an object becomes its own purpose. Architectural structures are contrasted with 
    machines, characterized as polyfunctional, and differentiated according to 
    their genre. In different historical periods different genres have become 
    models for the others. While the aesthetic function plays a similar role in 
    architecture as in the other arts, it never dominates the non-aesthetic 
    functions here; otherwise a building would become a sculpture. This fact 
    enables architecture to transmit the achievements of the arts to the everyday 
    life of a society. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    The aesthetic attitude  

    Kvetoslav Chvatík, University of Constance 

    Summary. The author demonstrates that Jan Mukarovský's classification of sign 
    functions is based on inadequate criteria, and he presents an alternative 
    typology for the possible fundamental attitudes of man towards the world. The 
    practical, theoretical, magical-religious, productive-aesthetic, and 
    receptive-aesthetic attitudes are characterized, and this approach is 
    confronted with other current conceptions of aesthetics. The realm of meaning 
    constituted by the aesthetic attitude is described as form-oriented, 
    integrative and holistic. The author investigates the role aesthetic codes and 
    contexts play when a recipient with an aesthetic attitude constructs the 
    specific meaning of a work of art. 


© 1999-2001, Webmaster Research Center for Semiotics, Institute for Linguistics, Fac. 1, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany