Research Center for Semiotics RCS

zur deutschen VersionEnglish version

Technical University Berlin
Technical University Berlin
Faculty 1: History and communication sciences
Institute for Linguistics
RCS Homepage
Info about RCS
Personnel
Research
Courses
Events
Specialist associations
Links
Zeitschrift für Semiotik
Address

 

______________________________________________________________________

The "Zeitschrift für Semiotik" 
Abstracts 
______________________________________________________________________ 
 
 

          "Sign Philosophy"

 
 

Year:      2000
Volume:  22
Number: 3-4

 

          _________________________________ 
           

           

             


    Sign philosophy and its Aristotelian roots  

    Dieter Münch, Technical University Berlin 

    Summary. Signs and semioses, the subject matter of semiotics, can be found everywhere. Moreover, they can be dealt with  in various ways, resulting in semiotics being puffed up in an unhealthy manner and its outline confused. This article, which presents reflections on the history of semiotics, is an attempt to define the original intention of semiotics. It shows that the American as well as the European directions of semiotic work can be understood as part of the Aristotelian tradition and that their topics are connected with the category problem. It suggests that by recourse to this intention semiotics will find a way out of its present crisis. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    The mediation of opinion and thought: semiotics in the work of Kant, Cassirer und Peirce   

    Frederik Stjernfelt, Copenhagen University 

    Summary. The paper presents the concepts of symbol and schema in Kant's work and discusses their elaboration by Ernst Cassirer and Charles S. Peirce. In Kant, the schema unites concept and intuition and thus becomes a condition for the possibility of objective science, while the symbol is an indirect schema - in present language: a metaphor. In Cassirer’s view the symbol becomes a general concept embracing all articulations of the human spirit, while the schema preserves its central place, now as the driving force in Cassirer's three-step interpretation of human civilization, ranging from Ausdrücke to Darstellungen and reine Bedeutungen. In this process, an important role is played by so-called "symbolic conciseness": symbolic conciseness can be regarded as a spontaneously occurring schematism which produces stable signs in the flux of Ausdrücke. In Peirce, a comparable schematic role is played by the diagram. It unites the similarity-based category of icons with that of symbols, which in Peirce's theory are general, thought-like signs. In his systems, diagrams become the very conditions for the possibility of any thought, thought always being general but able to subsume  a continuous range of individual iconic cases. The article also argues that both of Kant’s successors  share several interesting epistemological points of view. On the one hand, they 'phenomenologize' Kant: the object is no longer seen as a product of the mind's ability to synthesize; rather, it is presented as an undifferentiated whole which may in turn be analyzed in various ways by means of schematisms. On the other hand, they aim at a semiotics which implies an epistemology: Kant’s very concept of schematism entails an analysis of the intrinsic architecture of a sign’s signified, which necessarily combines thought and imagination. In this respect, both semioticians transcend the Saussurian concept of the sign, in which the definition of the signified has always been opaque, leading to widespread semiotic scepticism. 
     
     
     
     
     
     


    The principles of a philosophical universal language by Jakob Linzbach  

    Alexander Dmitrievic Dulicenko, University of Tartu 

    Summary. The Estonian semiotician Jakob Linzbach (1874 - 1953) pursued the project of a philosophical language, thereby continuing Leibniz' project of a characteristica universalis. In order to create an efficient language system he suggested several principles, which are discussed in this article. Although Linzbach's major work appeared in the same year as Saussure's Cours (1916), it shares many ideas; in particular, Linzbach anticipated basic phonological ideas. As is pointed out, this almost unknown semiotician, who was not allowed to publish in his later years, has contributed substantially to the development of the information-theoretic approach. 
     


© 1999-2001, Webmaster Research Center for Semiotics, Institute for Linguistics, Fac. 1, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany